by Peggy Robin
![]() |
------------ The "Get Out!" event of the week is posted on the Cleveland Park Listserv and on All Life Is Local on Thursdays. |
by Peggy Robin
![]() |
------------ The "Get Out!" event of the week is posted on the Cleveland Park Listserv and on All Life Is Local on Thursdays. |
by Peggy Robin
by Peggy Robin
I thought it would be a good idea to show a few photos of loving moms and babies to start your Mother's Day.
First, one of DC's most celebrated moms, Mei Xiang, with her growing cub, Tai Shan (formerly known familiarly as "Butterstick"):
Next, from the far-flung California coast (Monterey Bay) -- a sea otter mom cuddling her baby:
And now to Africa, where the fearsome rhino is a tenderly protective parent:
...and home again to DC, on Capitol Hill where we find this Mama Duck sheltering her duckling:
You might also enjoy this brief video of a different Mama Duck and her brood, who had hatched on a balcony near the Secret Service headquarters. The agents in charge of protecting people in power took the time to protect this little family by moving them down to the Capitol Reflecting Pool.
And (being a Robin myself) I have to end with this Mama Robin feeding her chicks.
by Peggy Robin
![]() |
by Peggy Robin
![]() |
by Peggy Robin
by Peggy Robin
![]() |
| Photo: Jeanne Stuart McVey |
by Peggy Robin
by Peggy Robin
by Peggy Robin
I found this revealing story about AI on SitForKnaTwit (my acronym for the Site Formerly Known As Twitter:
https://x.com/HedgieMarkets/status/2042430442448548273
by Hedgie @HedgieMarkets
🦔A researcher invented a fake eye condition called bixonimania, uploaded two obviously fraudulent papers about it to an academic server, and watched major AI systems present it as real medicine within weeks. The fake papers thanked Starfleet Academy, cited funding from the Professor Sideshow Bob Foundation and the University of Fellowship of the Ring, and stated mid-paper that the entire thing was made up.
Google's Gemini told users it was caused by blue light. Perplexity cited its prevalence at one in 90,000 people. ChatGPT advised users whether their symptoms matched. The fake research was then cited in a peer-reviewed journal that only retracted it after Nature contacted the publisher.
My Take: The researcher made the papers as obviously fake as possible on purpose. The AI systems didn't catch it. Neither did the human researchers who cited it in real journals, which means people are feeding AI-generated references into their work without reading what they're actually citing. I've covered the FDA using AI for drug review, the NYC hospital CEO ready to replace radiologists, and ChatGPT Health launching this year. All of that is happening in the same environment where a condition funded by a Simpsons character and endorsed by the crew of the Enterprise was being presented as emerging medical consensus. The people making these deployment decisions seem to believe the pipeline from research to AI to patient is more supervised than it actually is. This experiment suggests it isn't supervised much at all.
Hedgie🤗
----------
Still Life with Robin is an occasional column that comes out on some Saturdays, while the columnist is living part of each month in Philadelphia as a Granny/Nanny, in addition to trying to keep up with the CP Listserv.