The Washington Post announced today that it is prohibiting the use of its plastic newspaper bags for the collection of dog poop. The Washington Post is taking this action because it believes that using its bags for dog poop harms its reputation and image. "We're in the news business," Post executive editor Nathan Aldridge said. "We are not a dog poop disposal service." Aldridge added, "People are free to use The New York Times' plastic bags for Fido and Fluffy." The Post noted that plastic bags that have been used to collect dog poop cannot then be recycled. "This new policy is also a green policy," Aldridge said. Beginning next month, Post newspaper bags will have a license agreement on them that says, "Readers and subscribers agree not to use this bag for the collection of dog feces or other animal waste, and they further agree not to use this bag in any way that degrades, harms or damages the reputation of the Washington Post or its subsidiaries." When asked what would actually happen to people who violated the Post's new license agreement, Aldridge said, "Probably the same thing that happens to people who remove mattress tags. They have to live with the worry that one day they'll be found out and punished." The Post will be making a separate announcement next month regarding the use of its paper as the lining for bird cages. ---------- Is It News?, written by Bill Adler, is the Cleveland Park Listserv's humor column. You can read Is It News? at www.cleveland-park.com and www.alllifeislocal.com.
Sunday, August 15, 2010
Is It News?: The Washington Post Bars Its Newspaper Bags for Dog Poop
Labels:
dogs,
Is It News?,
Washington Post
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The bags are the perfect size for dirty diapers-I wonder if that counts...?
ReplyDelete