Photo by Mark Zimmermann via Creative Commons |
by Peggy Robin
A few days ago, WJLA local news aired a segment on the boundary
stones of DC – well worth two minutes and 51 seconds of your time:
I’m happy to pass along an informative and well-told story
of local lore – but in this case it happens to pair well with another piece of local
news about DC’s size and shape. DCist had a report on the Republican member of
the Virginia state legislature who would like to give away two big chunks of
Northern Virginia, now solidly Democratic, to DC, in hopes of making the state
less blue and more red, politically speaking. The story is here: https://dcist.com/story/20/01/21/republican-virginia-delegate-says-hed-support-giving-alexandria-and-arlington-to-d-c/?utm_source=DCist+Newsletters&utm_campaign=03d3df847e-DCIST_DAILY_2020_01_21_09_36&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_aa1cf64820-03d3df847e-221341481
(or go to http://bit.ly/2S9Ewmw if the long
link is broken in this email.)
What’s been proposed by Virginia Delegate Dave LaRock is
actually a give-back, rather than a give-away, because the two counties in question,
Arlington and Alexandria, were originally part of DC – and there are boundary
stones along the southern border to prove it. These two counties form the lower
portion of the diamond – or square turned on its point – that was the neatly
symmetrical shape of the District of Columbia from 1791, when the 10 square
mile plot of land was first surveyed, until 1846, when the land across the
Potomac was ceded back to Virginia. It was a move designed to preserve the
rights of slave traders, as the federal district moved to ban slave trading within its jurisdiction.
The land was given away in a bid to keep an oppressive
system going, but if it could be given back, it would help in the bid to give voting
rights to people too long deprived – namely the citizens of the District who
lack a vote in the House and Senate.
Of course, the citizens of Arlington and Alexandria would
never agree to lose their Congressional representation as part of a land deal.
So the idea would work only if paired with statehood and consequently full
voting representation for DC in Congress. With the addition of Arlington and
Alexandria, DC would gain a total of 395,530 in population (235,000 from Alexandria and 160,530
from Arlington) which, when added to DC’s current population of 711,571, would
bring DC's population up to over a million (1,107, 101). That would push our population ranking among the
states from third from the bottom, just ahead of Vermont and Wyoming, to 43rd among 50, just behind Maine with 1,338,404 and ahead of Montana with 1,062,305.
It would be so much harder to deny us statehood then.
Could this come about with the consent of the people involved? Not in today’s political climate, that's for sure. But it’s certainly something to think about for the future. Just imagine how much good would be accomplished in this move: from undoing the shameful, pro-slavery scheme put into effect back in 1846 to giving full political rights to District citizens who have been deprived since 1791. And let’s not forget the aesthetically pleasing result of squaring the box, or completing the diamond. Give DC back the symmetry of the perfect square it was always meant to have. And let's put all those south border boundary stones back within the District, where they belong!
To see the boundary stones on an interactive Google map, go
to:
----------------------------
Still Life with Robin is published on the Cleveland Park
Listserv and on All Life Is Local on Saturdays.
Dear Peggy,
ReplyDeleteDelightful Still Life this week. If it weren’t past 2:AM I’d play around with it for hours.As it is I will probably fiddle around with those boundary stone pictures and maps all next week!
Thanks!
Terrific post. Thx!
ReplyDelete