by Peggy Robin
The last week of the year is the time to see the holiday
blockbusters, the ones that will become Oscar contenders, the ones everyone’s
talking about. But there are so many! Unless you’re a true film buff, you may
not go out to see more than one or two, and wait for the others to come out on
Netflix or DVD. The question is, which ones are worth the trip to the theater
to see on the big screen --and shell out $11 per ticket-- and which ones are
fine to see much later, or simply skip altogether?
To answer this question, I have come up with a mathematical
formula to apply to each of the top 12 box office earners. The formula takes
into consideration audience response so far, based on the movie’s popularity rating
on the website Rotten Tomatoes, divided by the running time in minutes (on the
general principle that shorter is better, at least for me). The quotient is
then multiplied by 100, just so that I don’t have to work with decimals, which
confuse me. That leaves a base score for each movie. From that figure I then
take away points based on my own personal quirks of taste. It’s minus 30 points
for any movie that’s mainly Kiddie Fare (KF in the equations you see below). And
minus 20 for anything directed by Judd Apatow, or starring Seth Rogen (JA/SR). Minus 25 for any movie that has a castration
scene (C) -- and yes, I did make up this deduction specifically for Django
Unchained. And minus 5 for anything that’s part of a Franchise (F), like a
James Bond or Jack Reacher movie. (Okay, Jack Reacher is just one movie right
now, but wait -- more are coming!)
After the deductions are done, then I can add in the bonus
points: Plus 25 for anything based on a Book (B) I’ve read or feel that I ought
to have read. That applies to both Les Miserables and Life of Pi, but I’m not
telling what part of the rule applies to which one. Finally, I award 20 extra
points for any filmmaker willing to take a courageous Stand Against Slavery, or
any other Forced Labor Under Horrible Conditions (SAS/FLUHC). That will raise the
score a bit for Django Unchained, but it also gives a deserved boost to Lincoln
and Les Mis.
Here’s how the formula works on, for example, the Hobbit:
Start with a Rotten Tomatoes Score (RTS) of 65, divided by
Running Time in Minutes (RTM) of 170 = .38. Multiply by 100 to get rid of that pesky decimal point, then subtract
the Kiddie Fare (KF) deduction of 30 points, and then take away another 5 for
being part of the Lord of the Rings Franchise (F). Final score = 3.
Here are the scores for the top 12 box office movies, in
order from highest weekend box office take to lowest:
The Hobbit: 65 RTS divided by 170 RTM (this and all results X
100) = 38, minus 30 KF, minus 5 F = 3
Les Miserables: 71 RTS divided by 158 RTM = 45, plus 25 B,
plus 20 SAS/FLUHC = 90
Django Unchained: 81 RTS divided by 166 RTM = 49, minus 25 C,
plus 20 SAS/FLUHC = 44
Parental Guidance: 17 RTS divided by 105 RTM, no deductions
or bonuses = 16
Jack Reacher: 60 RTS divided by 130 RTM = 46, minus 5 F = 41
This Is 40: 50 RTS divided by 133 RTM = 38, minus 10 JA/SR =
28
Lincoln: 91 RTS divided by 149 RTM = 61, plus 20 SAS/FLUHC = 81
Monsters, Inc.: 96
RTS divided by 92 RTM = 104, minus 30 KF = 74
The Guilt Trip: 36 RTS divided by 96 RTM = 38, minus 10
JA/SR = 28
Rise of the Guardians: 74 RTS divided by 97 RTM = 76, minus 30 KF = 46
Skyfall: 92 RTS divided by 145 RTM = 63, minus 5 F = 58
Life of Pi: 89 RTS divided by 127 RTM = 70, plus 10 B = 80
And the winner is: Les Mis! If I only see one movie in the coming week, that will be it. But I think I'll see the runner-up, Lincoln, as well. If I have enough time, I'll go for a third, Life of Pi. And everything else is a "wait for the DVD" or "pass," according to its score. (Feel free to adjust the bonuses and deductions according to your own personal scale.)
------------
Still Life With Robin is published on the Cleveland Park
Listserv, www.cleveland-park.com, and
All Life Is Local on Saturdays.
No comments:
Post a Comment