by Peggy Robin
Why should you do this?
The proposed rule seeks to reinstate Schedule F, the administration’s never implemented plan to institutionalize political control and loyalty tests for the career bureaucracy by turning 50,000 or more career civil servants into political appointees.
Federal comments really do matter. By law, they must be read by the administration, and substantive comments require a response. Failure to do so can see the rule tossed out by courts.
It’s easy: Enter a comment here. No log in. Just click on the “submit a public comment” button. You can enter text, or upload a document.
The volume of opposing comments matters, so writing something short and sweet is great. You don’t need to read the rule in depth or be an expert. The proposed rule is bad and protecting nonpartisan civil servants is good. See more details below or take a look at the comments people have already posted.
More detailed and informed comments are even better. One thing that is different from the first time Schedule F was introduced is that we now have a track record showing how the much more politicized mismanagement of the federal government is having negative effects, and handing over more power would be a disaster. I am especially appealing to people with deep knowledge of policies and management to explain how Schedule F would hurt their domain of expertise. Please, please, please weigh in to provide actual information about how providing protections for career officials will protect against political abuses. If a bunch of people with real and credible experience comment, it becomes harder for the administration and judges to ignore us.
![]() |
Source: Dan Moynihan's Substack article June 20, 2024: The Public Opposes Trump's Plans to Politicize Public Services And John Oliver provides a Project 2025 explainer for you to share |
No comments:
Post a Comment