Since When Is Prayer Dangerous? Aircraft Goes into "Lockdown" When Passengers Pray

There are many ways that an aircraft can be harmed, but prayer isn't one of them. And yet, an Alaska Airlines flight went into "lockdown" mode on Monday, March 14, when three passengers started doing an orthodox Jewish prayer that included wearing leather straps on their foreheads and arms. The plane was met by the FBI when it landed in Los Angeles, where the passengers were "interviewed" and released, according to MSNBC.

This isn't the first time that suspicious prayer has caused moderate panic. In November 2006, six Muslims were removed from a flight in Minneapolis in handcuffs because of suspicious activity, including prayer. In January 2010, a Jewish passenger on a flight that had left LaGuardia caused the plane to be diverted because he was engaged in ritualistic morning prayer.

What does this mean? Should visible prayer be outlawed on aircraft? Hardly.

When a passenger is praying, he or she is not trying to light a shoe, pull out a gun, detonate a bomb, rush the cockpit with box cutters or commit some other dangerous act.

I know what the flight attendants and other passengers are thinking when they report this so-called suspicious activity: They're thinking that the passenger who's praying --always in some way that's unfamiliar to the flight attendant or the other passengers-- has set some kind of bomb to explode and the clock is ticking.  If that were actually the case, then it would be too late to do anything anyway.

Christine O'Donnell Watch: Be Afraid, Be Very Afraid

Because we DC residents don't have representation in Congress, it's only fair that we get to choose a nearby Congressional race to report on. We have adopted the United States Senate race in Delaware starring Christine O'Donnell, the Republican nominee and Tea Party candidate.

During a recent debate with her Democratic opponent, Chris Coons, O'Donnell caused the audience to gasp when she asked, "Where in the Constitution is the separation of church and state?" Her lack of understanding about the Constitution was as breathtaking as it was unnerving, particularly because she claims to have attended a graduate fellowship at the Claremont Institute -- which turned out to be only a one week course.

O'Donnell's Constitutional knowledge gap manifested itself this past week when her campaign threatened to sue radio station WDEL for posting a video of her interview on the Internet. Yes, really. The threat was, fortunately, later withdrawn.

Various polls put O'Donnell between 10 and 20 percentage points behind her rival. But in politics the unexpected can happen, especially because O'Donnell has access to a power that Coons may not be able to access. She said, "The day that we saw a spike in the polls was a day that some people had a prayer meeting for me that morning for this campaign so I believe that prayer plays a direct role in this campaign and I always ask please pray for the campaign."